A & S Software Consultancy Pvt. Ltd. A & S Software Consultancy Campus ERP since 2015

Multi-tenant SIS + LMS · Universities, colleges and schools

Every department working from the same student record

OltErp is a student information system and learning management system in one. It runs admission, academics, examinations, fee management, stores, leave, payroll and accreditation reporting on a single record — so the dean, the registrar, the controller of examinations and the finance officer all see the same numbers, because there is only one set of them.

Request a demo See the 22 modules

Implementing campus systems since 2015 ISO 9001:2008 ISO 27001:2013 NASSCOM · NSIC · MSME New Delhi & London
2015First campus implementation
22Integrated modules
2Offices — New Delhi, London
ISO 27001Information security compliant

The problem we are usually called about

Nobody disagrees about the policy. They disagree about the numbers.

Admissions keeps one spreadsheet. The examination cell keeps another. Accounts keeps a third, and none of them reconcile the week a NAAC or NBA submission is due. The cost is not licence fees — it is senior staff spending a fortnight assembling data that the institution already had.

01

One record, entered once

A student is admitted once. Attendance, internal marks, fee receipts, hostel allocation and the final transcript all attach to that same record, so there is nothing to reconcile afterwards.

02

Reporting is a query, not a project

NAAC, NBA, NIRF and AISHE submissions draw on live data. Student-teacher ratio, pass percentages, placement figures and fee collection come out of the system rather than out of fifteen departmental emails.

03

An audit trail that holds up

Every change carries a user and a timestamp. When a mark is revised or a fee is waived, the record shows who approved it — which is what an internal auditor or an accreditation peer team will ask for.

Built for the people accountable for it

What each office actually gets

Vice-Chancellor, Director, Principal

Admission pipeline, enrolment against sanctioned intake, fee collection against budget and examination results in one place, current as of today rather than as of the last review meeting.

Registrar

Student records, eligibility, migration and transfer certificates, convocation lists and statutory returns generated from the live register instead of reassembled each time.

Dean of Academics

Programme and curriculum structure, elective mapping, credit and course registration, teaching workload across departments, and internal assessment patterns visible before results are declared rather than after.

Dean, Executive Education & MDP

Management development programmes and executive education run on their own calendar, fee structure and nomination flow — corporate nominations, batch scheduling, attendance, feedback and certification — without forcing them into the degree-programme model.

Controller of Examinations

Examination scheduling, internal and external marks capture, moderation with an audit trail, result processing, transcripts and grade cards.

Finance Officer, Bursar

Fee structures by programme and category, online collection and receipts, dues tracking, and accounting ledgers that reconcile against collection without re-entry.

IT Head, Systems Manager

One vendor, one database, documented integrations, role-based access and an ISO 27001:2013 compliant supplier — instead of six point products and six support contracts.

Heads of department, faculty

Attendance marking, internal assessment, course files and grade submission from the faculty portal, with students seeing their own attendance and results without a counter queue.

Deployment

Multi-tenant SaaS, or standalone on your own servers

OltErp is a multi-tenant SIS and LMS. University systems, groups of colleges and school networks run every constituent institution on one platform, each with its own ordinances, fee structures, academic calendar and reporting — isolated from each other, consolidated when the board wants a group view.

Single institutions — including IIMs and other autonomous institutes — run the same product standalone, on their own infrastructure, where data residency policy or statutory position requires records to stay on campus. The functionality is identical; the decision is procurement and policy, not features.

Open the SaaS portal Discuss on-premise

Implementation

Migration is the project, not the software

Almost no institution starts from nothing. You have years of records across spreadsheets, a legacy application nobody maintains, and filing cabinets. We migrate that data, integrate with whatever you need to keep — the bank, the payment gateway, the biometric devices — and train each department on the modules it will use.

We are ISO 27001:2013 compliant and sign a non-disclosure agreement on every engagement before any institutional data is shared with us.

Alliance

In alliance with OLT ERP Limited, London

We work in alliance with OLT ERP Limited, a London-based EdTech company registered in England and Wales, which delivers the Campus Management System and Eudemonic AI.

Eudemonic AI is a student wellbeing platform developed with UK universities. Where an institution runs it alongside OltErp, engagement signals the student record already holds — attendance, submission patterns, assessment performance — can inform wellbeing support early, rather than after a student has already disengaged. For deans and directors of student affairs, that moves intervention from reactive to timely.

The alliance also gives institutions in India and the United Kingdom a single delivery team across both jurisdictions: UK-facing engagement and product development through OLT ERP Limited in London, and implementation, migration and support through our New Delhi office.

How the alliance works Visit olterp.co.uk

Questions we are asked before a demo

Straight answers

Can we go live before the next admission cycle?

Usually yes, if we start with admission and fees and phase the rest. We scope against your academic calendar, not ours, and say plainly if a date is not realistic.

What happens to our existing data?

It is migrated. Student history, fee ledgers and examination records come across; we agree the cut-off and reconcile before go-live.

Who owns the data?

The institution does, in every deployment model. It is stated in the contract, and an export is available at any time in a documented format.

Do you support NAAC, NBA and NIRF?

Yes. Ratios, pass percentages, placement and research data are drawn from live records, which is also what makes them defensible to a peer team.

Will our staff actually use it?

We train per department on the modules that department touches, not a single generic session. Adoption failures are almost always training failures.

What does it cost?

It depends on student numbers, modules and deployment model. Tell us those three and we will give you a figure rather than a brochure.

Tell us which office is causing the most friction

We would rather show you the two modules that fix it than walk you through a generic demo of twenty-two.

Request a demo Contact us